30-10-2022, 08:32 PM
round 3 nova prospect 8:40PM
At 8:40PM, round 2 on nova prospect today I was playing as a CT and there was less than 10 Ts alive. I felt like getting the round over with so I initiated a game of iSpy for LR. Smucc messaged me something along the lines of "don't do that that's boring". I then proceeded to play iSpy because 1. Smucc is just reccommending me not to because he wants to see something more fun and 2. iSpy is not a banned game, there was less than 10 Ts that would die to the game so it was completely legal to play. I disregarded Smucc's opinion on my choice of game as the warden and played it. Then he messaged me saying "Don't be a boring cunt", and the next round he slayed me at the start of the round. This is a perfect example of admin abuse. I have read rule 2, and Smucc did not 'tell me to do something', and even if he did the game I played was entirely legal from every point of view. Does this mean if an admin has an opinion of a game being boring they are allowed to slay someone for playing it, because they justify it with a warning? If so then admins should be slaying the warden every time they do 1 bhop on revolution. This does not happen, and the admins are inconsistent. I call for either a rule change or punishment for Smucc because he clearly abused his admin powers.
He who would live must fight. He who doesn't wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to exist.
- The greatest artist of all time
At 8:40PM, round 2 on nova prospect today I was playing as a CT and there was less than 10 Ts alive. I felt like getting the round over with so I initiated a game of iSpy for LR. Smucc messaged me something along the lines of "don't do that that's boring". I then proceeded to play iSpy because 1. Smucc is just reccommending me not to because he wants to see something more fun and 2. iSpy is not a banned game, there was less than 10 Ts that would die to the game so it was completely legal to play. I disregarded Smucc's opinion on my choice of game as the warden and played it. Then he messaged me saying "Don't be a boring cunt", and the next round he slayed me at the start of the round. This is a perfect example of admin abuse. I have read rule 2, and Smucc did not 'tell me to do something', and even if he did the game I played was entirely legal from every point of view. Does this mean if an admin has an opinion of a game being boring they are allowed to slay someone for playing it, because they justify it with a warning? If so then admins should be slaying the warden every time they do 1 bhop on revolution. This does not happen, and the admins are inconsistent. I call for either a rule change or punishment for Smucc because he clearly abused his admin powers.
He who would live must fight. He who doesn't wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to exist.
- The greatest artist of all time