Counter, thank you for submitting this staff complaint. I'd like to start off by saying the round wasn't delayed because candy decided to respawn instead of /rollbacking. The round was delayed because you let your team mates kill the Ts that came down the elevator. First thing we noticed when watching the demo was that you had multiple opportunities to say "Don't kill the Ts who come down the elevator". Your fellow CTs were talking about killing the Ts, that should of been a red flag and a perfect opportunity to tell them to not kill the Ts. Instead you wait until last minute to do so, which by then Nayeon was already prepared to kill them. You mention that Candy didn't act for 3-5 seconds after the mass killing went on. As a staff member you must be aware of what is happening at all times. You think 3-5 seconds is too long. I disagree. I respect Candy for acting as quickly as she did. She prevented anymore killing from her swift actions and most importantly she was aware of what was happening on the server. She then respawned the three Ts that were freekilled and offered to bring them upstairs. Respawning was the best action in this situation as there was many factors that could mess with the rollback such as issues like Ts getting stuck in the floor/ceiling, let me remind you they had just came down the elevator. Any rollback over a few seconds would of glitched Ts inside the roof of the elevator or even on top of it. The situation was handle correctly by Candy and resulted in everyone being happy, except you. Not sure if you were upset because your round wasn't "100% win rate perfect" or because you didn't get to see anyone getting CTBanned, which is clearly a turn on for you. Admin discretion is a big factor that admins must take in. Candy didn't CTBan anyone because she believed it wasn't necessary for a punishment that harsh. Nowhere in that round did I witness any inappropriate, unfair and unprofessional behavior from Candy.
Now for the "unfair slay". You were slayed for playing a game in a way that it was unfair for the Ts. When playing Simpson Shootout you must make sure everyone has the same amount of turns, and if that's not possible you must make it fair by playing other games such as Eye Spy. You played it unfairly by getting the winner of each round to verse the next person down on the leaderboard. Doing it this way would of meant that the first T on the leaderboard would of had to win a minimum of 7 rounds of Simpson Shootout, while the last T on the leaderboard would of only had to win 1. Completely unfair. Favouritism was shown to the last T on the leaderboard as he would of had an easy journey to LR. Candy said she messaged you to tell you to not do it that way. You were slayed because you either didn't see the message, or saw it and chose to ignore it. Either way the slay was reasonable.
If you believe I've missed anything or disagree with me feel free to message me on discord. Other than that this thread is closed.
Now for the "unfair slay". You were slayed for playing a game in a way that it was unfair for the Ts. When playing Simpson Shootout you must make sure everyone has the same amount of turns, and if that's not possible you must make it fair by playing other games such as Eye Spy. You played it unfairly by getting the winner of each round to verse the next person down on the leaderboard. Doing it this way would of meant that the first T on the leaderboard would of had to win a minimum of 7 rounds of Simpson Shootout, while the last T on the leaderboard would of only had to win 1. Completely unfair. Favouritism was shown to the last T on the leaderboard as he would of had an easy journey to LR. Candy said she messaged you to tell you to not do it that way. You were slayed because you either didn't see the message, or saw it and chose to ignore it. Either way the slay was reasonable.
If you believe I've missed anything or disagree with me feel free to message me on discord. Other than that this thread is closed.
Anthonyy#5473