29-07-2018, 09:31 AM
The ban must be removed if admin nehpets does not make a statement of truth swearing there is a ban reason and what that ban reason is. Until then the ban should be suspended.
The ban reason must be reasonable and if outside the normal banning procedures (which this case appears) the ban proposal should be held in front of a jury of players.
If the ban reason is still upheld at that time, the ban should be reviewed by a independent admin on the admin review team who has had sufficient training, including a course conducted by the Players Union.
Noted in that appeal should be the information that TACO is a regular player with general good standing within the community.
After such action if the decision is unfavorable to TACO there should be an option to appeal that decision with a full board of admin review officers with a full legal representation for player TACO.
Until the time of appointees to admin review board and said decisions including the possible lodgement of statement of truth from admin nehpets the ban should be suspended.
The ban reason must be reasonable and if outside the normal banning procedures (which this case appears) the ban proposal should be held in front of a jury of players.
If the ban reason is still upheld at that time, the ban should be reviewed by a independent admin on the admin review team who has had sufficient training, including a course conducted by the Players Union.
Noted in that appeal should be the information that TACO is a regular player with general good standing within the community.
After such action if the decision is unfavorable to TACO there should be an option to appeal that decision with a full board of admin review officers with a full legal representation for player TACO.
Until the time of appointees to admin review board and said decisions including the possible lodgement of statement of truth from admin nehpets the ban should be suspended.